Fourth International Documents

Conferences, congresses and resolutions, in English

History › Part 4, vol. 4

Excerpt of a Letter from Sherry Mangan to Michel Pablo

Sherry Mangan · 12 January 1954 · 278 words

From Towards a History of the Fourth International, Part 4, vol. 4: Struggle in the Fourth International: International Secretariat Documents, 1951-1954, Volume 4 of 4 volumes (Education for Socialists, Socialist Workers Party, New York, March 1974), pp. 177. Reproduced with the permission of Pathfinder Press. Scan: Encyclopedia of Trotskyism On-Line.

[In response to the International Committee's declaration of a public faction and "no confidence" in Pablo's leadership, Pablo chose the road of declaring a "split." Excerpts from a letter by Sherry Mangan to Pablo (Mangan was an American Trotskyist who lived in Europe) indicate that not all of those who agreed with his political views were pleased with the organizational methods he had chosen for handling differences in the world movement.]

[p. 177]

Dear G:

On receipt of your note of 8 January, I went to 116 [116 University Place in New York City, the former national headquarters of the SWP]....

I did affectionately curse you for asking me to do this, because, just as I expected, I was very cordially received, and overwhelmed with invitations to meet everybody privately — most of which I fended off. But I shall now have some very awkward evenings, I can foresee. Only to Han. [Joseph Hansen] did I spit out anything: he was so friendly that my wit got the better of me, and I said on parting: "Thank you for your cordial reception. But look out. Remember Terence-Patrice's [pseudonyms used by Mangan] reputation as 'the great unifier'. Maybe in another year I'll be back with full powers and reasonable propositions; and then you'll be embarrassed." Forgive me for this frivolity, but il etait plus fort que moi.

May I add that the atmosphere in University Place is, despite all, very busy, active, efficient, and hopeful — which is more than I can say off hand for our people, whose paper, as I read it each month, is never against the general line, but so dilutes it that, as my girl remarked the other night, the Farmer-Labor "Progressive" [a liberal monthly] sounds much more radical. I can't too much blame them, because the atmosphere here is irrespirable. Still . . . You remember my old formula about legality: that one prepares the second-line trench with the most foresighted technical care, but one does not abandon the first-line trench until literally blasted out of it. . . .

Affectionately,

12 January 1954

Something wrong on this page?